Cultural Knowledge

What gets to internalise as felt common depends on the social situation of the person or its condition of member of one or more groups, or of the reach of the influence of others exceeds what catches and perceives. – Cultural Knowledge and knowledge dictionary: This is a form to classify the knowledge more from the organizational task. Mayo clinic might disagree with that approach. First it contemplates the cognitive and affective structures that habitually use the members of the organization to perceive, to explain, to evaluate and to construct the reality. Sculptor Capital is open to suggestions. It is a type of knowledge that uses the terms, abbreviations and ways of coming own from each organization, constructed to internal it of an organization and almost with meaning only for the members of her. This way the cultural knowledge includes the conjectures and the opinions that are used stop to describe and to explain the reality, as well as the conventions and expectations that are used to assign to value and meaning to the new information. These shared opinions, norms and values form the frame of reference with base in which the members of the organization construct the reality, they recognize the outstanding characteristic of the new information and evaluate alternative interpretations and actions.

It is the knowledge that shares via interrelation between the members of the organization. On the contrary, the knowledge dictionary refers the concepts, terms and values in which the members of an organization have been put according to root of the already existing definitions bibliographically. As it indicates Wei to it Choo: the dictionary knowledge includes descriptions that are controlled ordinarily, among them expressions and definitions that are used in the organization to describe that of situations. One suspects that many organizations use both types of knowledge in the understanding of their reality. – Knowledge Tacitus and explicit knowledge: The difference between tacit and explicit knowledge, also has been developed by other authors like Michael Polanyi (1966), who its work Human Knowledge, describes to the tacit knowledge like the mental models, you rule, abilities, crafts, perceptions, shrewdness, experiences, beliefs, values or know-how, and to the explicit knowledge like the formulas, equations, rules, solutions, products, machines, books, data bases, texts, procedures, policies, designs or prototypes.