Federal Senate

Here, also it is easy to understand the objectives and the bred difficulties. But it has other aberrations in the draft of the project and nothing it is seen that it improves the things, in the direction of moralizar the performance of them parliamentarians and removing of the old text (effective in a sea of roses since 1970) excrescncias that allow to the disobediences and impunity, as the ones that regulate ' ' immunity parlamentar' ' , the remuneration, the benefits and the part to discipline. Not, what it favors them parliamentarians they do not move, but some thing who still confuse, this enters in the reform, to improve (for they). The objective presumption of ' ' reforma' ' it would be to give more transparency (I hate this word) and celeridade to the legislative project. Ah, as they subestimam and find the people ingenuous P, will be that nobody goes to say nothing on this and to provoke the debate politician, before the project is approved as is drawn? They go to allow plus this humbug against the people? It would be good that all read, they divulgasssem and they spread the subject in the Internet. Who knows, thus, the Opposition or the OAB or the media decides to intervine. Sources: Agency Senate and excessively cited with respective links in the body of the text Note: For who if to interest in knowing and/or studying the entire text of the Internal regulation of the Senate, today in vigor, they follow links: 1) Agency Senate: Internal regulation of the Federal Senate; 2) Scribd: – Internal regulation of the Federal Senate